Wednesday, 11 September 2013

First Assignment: Find a Final Project and Summarize!


1.      Identity:

                           A final Project

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LITERACY APPROACH TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL (The Case of VIII Grade Members of Extra English Activities “SMP Muhammadiyah” IV Semarang).

A final project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of sarjana pendidikan in English.

By: Fiter Johan
2201906012


English department
Faculty of language and arts
Semarang state university
2010

2.      Write the research question, problem, and objective!

1. Research question:
Background of study
A long ago English has been included in the curriculum of junior high school. It is reasonable because English is an international language and also the main language used in international scientific community. Realizing the importance of English, teachers of English have to be aware that English has four essential skills to be taught. The students have to be able to speak, listen, read, and write. In English well speaking is the most important one but it is not easy to make students speak fluently, so the teacher must work hard and prepare suitable methods in teaching speaking.
Improving students speaking skill needs good teaching method such as literacy approach. The approach is not fixed and finite state but development process. The development of literacy involves developing control over different kinds of language. Useful summaries of various responses to the question of what literacy is, have been provided by Wells (1991), Grant (1986) and Freebody and Luke (1990), there are similarities in the positions that they take. Below are:
1.      a. Can you help me please?
b. sure, what can I do for you?
2.      a. Can I go to the party?
b. Yes, sure. But you have to be home by midnight.


1.2  Reason for Choosing Topic                       
I choose the topic because of the following reasons. I taught English at SMP Muhammadiyah IV Semarang for three months, I found that most students are enthusiastic in learning English speaking. Second, I feel challenged to support them to improve their speaking skill with literacy approach method. Moreover, I tried to analyze the problems in order to get some solutions, hoping that it would become contribution especially to develop speaking skill teaching and English teaching in general.

1.3   Statement of Problem
The focus of this study is the effectively of literacy approach to improve speaking skill. The problem posed:

1.      How is literacy approach used to improve students’ speaking ability?


1.4    Objective of Study
The objectives of the study are as follows:
a.       How is literacy approach used to improve students’ speaking ability?

3. Heading of chapter 2
2.1 Review of Previous Studies
Badriah Dewi (2005:21) states that the ability of the observer for create theoretical frame will hoot with the deep library study, as effort to get several reference which support and accurate to discuss observation border which do. Next the theoretical frame which create will be used when the observer do the observation hypothesis.
Library study have some function includes:
1.      Provide theory or conception frame for observation was planned.
2.      Provide information about previous observation relation with observation will do.
3.      Give information about methods, population and sample, instrument, and data analysis are used to observation did before.
4.      Provide finding, observation conclusion related with finding and our conclusion.

2.2  Theoretical background
Spoken and written language typically function in different ways, to fulfill different social purposes, in different context of use. The development of literacy involves developing control over different kinds of language, as well as learning the different technologies through which written language is encoded (Hammond, 1992, p.9)
2.2.1        Literacy
Well (1991: 52-53) describes a number of levels of literacy, each of which represents a different view of literacy. The first level is what he call per formative. The second level described by Wells is what he call functional. The third level referred by Wells is what he call informational. The four level described by Wells is what he call epistemic.

2.2.2        Teaching
Jeremy harmer (1997:267) states the ability to speak fluently presupposes not only knowledge of language features, but the ability to process information and language on the spot as well.
2.2.3        Mental/social processing
Improving productive ability involves the knowledge of language.
2.2.4        Classroom speaking activities
·         Activity from a Script
We can ask our students to act out scenes from plays and or their course book, sometimes filming the results.
·         Communication games
Which are designed to provoke communication between students frequently depend on an information gap so that one student has to talk to a partner in order to solve a puzzle.
·         Discussion
One of the reason that discussion fail (when they do) is that students are reluctant to give an opinion in front of whole class.
2.2.5 Interpersonal Communication
a. Understanding interpersonal communication
     We can understand means or understanding of interpersonal communication easy before we have understand the meaning of interpersonal communication.
b.      Interpersonal communication system
Consists of Interpersonal perception, self-concept, interpersonal attraction, and interpersonal relationship.

c.       Interpersonal relationship
Effective communication is signed, with good interpersonal relationship.


2.3 Principles for teaching speaking to intermediate learners
2.3.1 Plan speaking task that involve negotiation for meaning.
2.3.2 Design both transactional and interpersonal speaking activities.
2.3.3 Personalize the content of speaking activities whenever possible.

2.4 action research
2.4.1 Definition of action research
2.4.2 Aims of action research
2.4.3 Characteristic of action research
a. On the job problem oriented
b. Problem solving oriented
c. Improvement oriented
d. Multiple data collection
e. Cyclic
f. Participatory (collaborative)

2.4.4 The steps in doing action research
2.4.4.1 Planning
2.4.4.3  Action research
2.4.4.3 Observation
2.4.4.4  Reflection

4. Conclusion (chapter V)
5.1 Conclusions
Based on the result of the analysis in the previous chapter, the writer concludes that:
5.1.1 The student understanding in teaching English speaking interpersonal expression by the literacy approach method comes through physical movement. They would perceive the sense of the expression he has heard by looking at the movement of body. In other words, by understanding the speaking interpersonal expression. First the students can improve their speaking skill. The students’ progress during the teaching and learning activity by using literacy approach is great.
5.1.2 After conducting the research, the writer concludes that the advantage of using literacy approach in teaching speaking interpersonal expression are:
          a. The literacy approach motivates the students since it enjoyable.
          b. In the literacy approach class, the students memorize and acquire the language through action.
Literacy approach also has some disadvantages, they are:
a.       It should be paid attention that if it is overused the literacy approach may cause boredom and tiredness.
b.      It is limited in terms of language scope.